Critically Evaluate The Literature On Leadership And Explain Its Relevance To The Effective Management Of Change. You Should Support Your Argument With Reference To Two Organisations That Have Undergone Successful Change.

LITERATURE ON LEADERSHIPWhat do Pope John capital of Minnesota II , Adolf Hitler , Winston Churchhill , Queen Elizabeth II , Bill Gates stomach in common ? They were all loss drawing cards who shaped the archives of the world in politics , business technology and perform history . These leaders were getting things done by functional with commonwealth . They move over use the process of leadership to produce certain objects .Since leadership is an important ingredient of life thither has been many studies and research ab go forth leadership . Its definition , theories and fifty-fifty the leadership style . First , let us guess to define what leadership is leadinghip is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent . leadership should have a very good influencing powers .To place out the goal of the group or the organisation . Leaders carry out this process by applying their leadership attributes , such as belief , values , ethics , character knowledge , and skillsLeadership is a process of getting done through and with people Leaders should always remember that leadership is people oriented . As a good leader , you should know how to deal , transmit ,manage people Being a leader ,we should know how to win teamwork in our organisationAre leaders born or made ? heartfelt leaders ar made not born . If you have the desire and willpower , you can become an effective leader . Good leaders develop through a never ending process of self-study , education training , and experience . This charge will help you through the processWhat is the difference between a leader and a motorbus ? Although these words are used interchangeably , there are differences as well as similarities A leader have a willing pursual composition the theater director got result through people . A leader uses influence to attain the goal while a manager must have an authority to rule a particular organisation .

A leader earn the overcompensate to lead from followers while a manager unremarkably granted by the owners of the organisation the power to rule . A good leader ask suggestions and comments from the group while the manager will just tell and give instructions . A leader have a personal power to people while the manager have a position power- they could be a CEO or President . A leader initiates changes , doing something completely something new and dream for new directions for the group while a manager produces goods and services . The difference between the 2 is like the difference between male and female . They are two sides to the same coin While they are varied , they still are similarAccording to ( Hellriegel. 7 ) he defined manager as a person who plans , organizes , directs and controls the allocation of human ,material , pecuniary ,and information resources in pursuit of the organisation s goal . Managers could be a department managers , account managers division managers , district managers or task force managers . What they have in common is certificate of indebtedness for the efforts of a group of people who share a goal and access to resources that the...If you want to get a full essay, indian lodge it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .