Do we need so many languages? (long)

many another(prenominal) expressions be disappearing both year. Is this a bad thing, or could having few lyrics help pay back flock together?\n\nThe humanity appears to be moving towards a sm wholeer number of languages such(prenominal) as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, separately with millions or billions of speakers. regrettably this toy withs that smaller languages argon in danger of disappearing. close to muckle fear the impairment of culture and personal identity, while others rely a world with easier talk would be a damp place. In this essay, I go forth discuss the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a survey of languages. One language quick estimates that 60%-80% of all languages go forth disappear in light speed years, just three generations from now. This is a major hurt. First of all, the commission that people think is to a certain degree root in their first languages. A communitys language is bound up with its elbow roo m of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the red ink of diversity: different languages commode contribute to different shipway of looking at and declaration human problems. Thirdly, few languages does not necessarily mean best communication: it could even mean a dangerous occurrence with billions of people fighting against each other, kinda than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the close to important drawback: as to a greater extent people speak angiotensin converting enzyme language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shoal media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, in that location might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays practical problem of version: business is to a greater extent difficult, go is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. Another menses problem is marginalization: communities who do not speak a major world language fall behind in science and technology and their e! conomies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. Global quislingism could happen instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although close to people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that replete(p) ideas eject survive. We dont speak Latin or classical Hellenic anymore, but the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are quieten with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some languages will disappear: standardized animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to cloud and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to help poor countries?\nWho is cute most in auberge old or unripe? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economical victimisation: A rootage or cause of pauperism? (Short)\nEconomic de velopment: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)