Law School Memo For Wills Class

Name of StudentName of ProfessorName of SubjectDateRe : This seeks to write a memo that critiques the dispositive provisions of the result instruments drafted for the purpose of suggest specific addition , deletions and modification and condone the reasons for suggestions . To take in of the objectives of this it is therefore necessary to have the documents to conform to capital of South Carolina law while accomplishing the Cook s goals1 . Issue StatementThe issue is furbish up whether the testaments of Andy Cook and Betty Cooks atomic number 18 valid or if there be provisions that must be added , deleted or modified to attain what was desire as goals by the spouses in accordance with capital of South Carolina Code of Trust and Estate2 . Brief AnswerThe answers to the question may simply be found by an examination of the very provisions of the pass on analyzing its validity as against the requirements of the law and brisk commandment on the matter3 . Statement of FactsThe testament of Andrew Cook and Betty Cook atomic number 18 given for possible specific addition , deletions and modification with story of the reasons . The will of the spouses assume the existence of trusts already created before the will and under theirs will by stating how they should be managed after his oddment . Andrew is also assumed to have not made whatever contract with her spouse Betty who also prepared almost the equivalent will as that of Andrew . It would appear the Andrew is assumed to die in the lead of Betty and their deaths would be followed by their children if such so happen from the channel of Andrew will . But from the point of view of Betty will , Andrew will die later .

In effect , both will are in anticipation of the death of twoWills are ways to make dispositions of properties and right while the person are bouncy but they are to take effect upon the death of the testator . To establish their validity , there is need to compare the selfsame(prenominal) with the provisions of the Columbia s Trust and Estate Code and the existing jurisprudence4 . DiscussionThe Will of Andy Cook provides I , Andrew Cook , a resident of De Vivos Country , Columbia , declare to be my willI am espouse to Betty Cook , who is hereafter as my spouseThe name and birth dates of my children are : Denise Cook : Michael and Elizabeth . All references in this to my children are to the children just names and no others . All references in this will to my issue are to my children so definedThe above part of the will appears not to despoil the provisions of the Columbia Trusts and Estate Code and the Andrew Cook has whole the right to make the same . His acknowledgement of his spouse and children in the will therefore excludes on the whole others that may have piece in the property he is bequeathing . By so excluding all others from the definition of children , he appeared to...If you want to get a all-inclusive essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .