After its release in tardy 2008, critical responses to Australia tended to focus on the question of its historical accuracy or otherwise. Outrage at the films historical misrepresentation was the tenor of Germaine Greers lengthy response to Marcia Langtons positive review of the film in the Age.
Whereas Langton celebrated the films self-conscious national apologue-making, arguing that it had leaped over the ruins of the news report wars and given Australians a new past a myth of national origin that is disturbing, thrilling, heartbreaking, hilarious and touching and an alternative history from the one John Howard and his followers constructed, Greer criticised the film for romanticising both Aborigines and our blue frontier. She complained that Aboriginal peoples exploitation as workers in the pastoral industry was not properly portrayed. The camera, she wrote, does not decease to where the Aboriginal workers would have lived with their extended families in a collection of humpies shelters made of bark and branches with no clean water, no sanitisation and no electricityĆ¢¦ The Aboriginal workers would not have been paid, tho simply given poor-quality rations, because the station owner claimed the whole biotic community as dependents.
The debate between Greer and Langton over...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment