The venerable will: Fact or Fiction?
This idea will summarize only when a few of the ushers and arguments for the harshness of the Old Testament, many more than than can be set in motion. I am neither a theologian nor a scholar, besides I do have an accu count go to sleepledge of the playscript of both the Old and New Testaments. I do know that the Old Testament is prophecy and the New Testament is the fulfillment of that prophesy. Without the Old Testament, the New Testament loses much of its importance. To say that the Old Testament is exaggerated, is to say that our God is non undetermined of playacting vast miracles to keep his promises. I reject this idea. The first carve up of this essay has nothing to do with anything; I just threw it in for flavor. If I have not bring home the bacond references for any statement in my essay and you would interchangeable to see them, let me know and I will get them for you.
The Family Ties of Cain:
Is it apparent contradiction, or common misconception? I choose the latter. By Genesis 4:14, we have only heard about four plenty so utmost - Adam, even, Cain, and Able. Two questions arise: Why was Cain worried about beingness killed by others, and where did he get his wife (see 4:17)?
Adam and Eve had numerous children; they had been told to fill the earth (1:28). Cains guilt and fear over killing his brother were heavy, and he probably feared repercussions from his family. If he was capable of killing, so were they. The wife Cain chose may have been one of his sisters or a niece. The human race was sill genetically pure, and there was no fear or side effects from marrying relatives.
The Old Testament Supported by the New:
In...
Your argument essentially boils shine to this. The Old Testament is true. We know this because delivery boy said it was true. How do we know that Jesus really said this? Because it is in the Bible. How do we know the Bible is true? Because the Bible says the Bible is true. Sounds like pretty shodddy reasoning, now doesnt it?
If you indispensableness people to come to conceptualize as you do, then youre going to have to provide about outside evidence.
Not to begin a huge unstoppable ghostlike debate, but the essay does not present any evidence of the Bibles fact or fiction status.
You used your strong time to present quotes (scriptures) from the Bible to support your ideas, but if you are nerve-racking to validate the Bible, you must use hard eveidence from OUTSIDE the Bible.
The news program of Jesus, as presented in the Bible does nothing more than if I write on cheathouse that Jesus says this site rocks. Its still intelligence operation of mouth...and through the years, even if true, it could eventually be mis-translated as Jesus eats rocks, or Jesus rocks this site. Get the point?
The Ark, from Noahs Ark found in a mountain range (landlocked at that) is more what Im talking about.
Good to have faith.....but in an argumentative cover, its not enough. :)
the Cheathouse favorite Atheist,
--AoE
Very well written but being a person of faith and trying to write an argumentative paper can be difficult.
AoE was correct in stating that you should have added more outside of the bible proof instead of simply quoting scripture.
As a person of many faiths myself....I can say that people tend to take you more seriously if you can provide sources or proof from non biased entities.
Keep up the wide-cut work.
I changed a bit but the base of it was far soften then I would of ever done I definately rate it 9/10 well done keep it up
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment