A group paper written with objections to human cloning

Humans have searched for the key to immortality throughout history. Cloning is the beginning of globe playing the role of God. Though there whitethorn be some benefits to cl adept, the importance of the religious aspect and the impact copy would have on society should be a polarity to mankind that cloning should be out of the question.

Beneficial factors of human cloning be a little ill thought out. A couple has one kid and then cant have any longer children. Cloning would enable a couple to have a stand by child, maybe a younger twin of the freshman child,(LChaim). True that cloning could help this couple, but the children later may have a sort of identity crisis, and sooner or later the couple will have to explain to the children how the second child was born. That itself can lead to emotional damage. Another so-called benefit is testing for genetic disease Cloning engineering can be functiond to test for and perhaps remediation genetic diseases (Human Cloning Foundation). In my opinion, its equivalent saying scientists are breeding human universes to use as lab rats. Humanists pass off that inhuman and demeaning. A number of scientists have conducted experiments. They believe, with stable grounding, that the fears of the reality about cloning being abused is a dim-witted fallacy (Eric). They do have some reason to fear.



It is like playing god to create a human being from another to look exactly the same, when god had made that one person a broke the mold to never be made again.

Cloning humans is ethically unacceptable. The President of the United States of America, George W. bush, told reporters that, The use of human embryos to clone is wrong (and) we should not, as a society, jump life to destroy it., and that is exactly what is...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.